I often see teams copy competitor pricing pages verbatim and then wonder why they can't close enterprise deals. A public pricing page is a marketing artifact — it signals positioning — but it rarely reflects the packaged commercial options enterprises expect. Over the past decade I’ve translated dozens of competitor pages into testable, winning price tiers. Below I share a pragmatic framework I use to convert messy competitor data into three enterprise-ready tiers you can test in-market this quarter.
Why three tiers?
Three tiers give you clarity without paralysis. The upper tier anchors perceived value, the middle tier becomes the logical choice for most customers, and the lower tier captures price-sensitive prospects or pilots. For enterprise deals you need clear upgrade paths, commercial levers (SLA, support, onboarding), and room to negotiate without breaking your model.
Step 1 — Extract and normalize competitor signals
Start with a disciplined extraction process. Competitor pricing pages mix product, feature lists, and marketing language. I create a simple spreadsheet and capture:
- Public price anchors (if any) — per user, per seat, per month, per annum
- Feature bullets and feature categories (core vs. premium)
- Support levels mentioned (email, phone, dedicated CSM)
- Contract terms called out (annual discounts, minimums, onboarding fees)
- Any case studies or logos that hint at target segments
I then normalize everything into comparable units (e.g., per seat/year) and separate hard features from marketing claims. This lets you see the true differentiators rather than rhetorical flourishes.
Step 2 — Map the enterprise buying requirements
Public pages rarely list what enterprises actually buy. I interview sales reps, customer success, and 3–5 existing enterprise customers to validate what matters. Typical enterprise priorities are:
- Security & compliance (SSO, SOC 2, data residency)
- Integrations & APIs (long-term platform fit)
- Support/response SLAs and escalation paths
- Onboarding and professional services
- Pricing predictability and discounts for multi-year commitments
Use these inputs to create a "must-have" checklist for an enterprise offering. If a competitor lists “advanced analytics,” ask whether that maps to a specific enterprise requirement (custom dashboards, data export, or training) or is just a marketing label.
Step 3 — Define the three tiers and their commercial levers
I build tiers around three commercial levers: product scope, service level, and contract terms. Naming matters — pick descriptive names that resonate with buyers (e.g., Starter/Premium/Enterprise is less useful than Growth/Scale/Strategic).
| Product Scope | Service Level | Contract | Target Buyer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Growth | Core product, limited integrations | Email support, community | Monthly or annual | Small teams or pilots |
| Scale | All core features + advanced analytics, 3rd-party integrations | Standard SLA, onboarding package | Annual with volume discounts | Mid-market, teams scaling usage |
| Strategic | Full platform + custom integrations & APIs | Dedicated CSM, 24/7 SLA, professional services | Multi-year with committed spend & custom terms | Enterprise buyers needing risk reduction |
Every feature and service should map to one of these tiers. If a single checkbox on your competitor page is being sold as both "premium" and "enterprise," pick one — duplicating benefits across tiers dilutes differentiation.
Step 4 — Set price anchors and testable hypotheses
Don’t guess — set explicit hypotheses. For each tier I set a price anchor and a testable conversion hypothesis. Examples:
- Scale tier priced at $X per seat/year will convert 8–12% of inbound demo requests into paid accounts (baseline: current 5%).
- Strategic tier packaged with a 6-week onboarding bundle and 1:1 CSM at 15% premium will increase Average Contract Value (ACV) by 30% for deals closed with procurement involved.
- Offering an annual discount (15%) on Scale increases upsell from Growth by 20% in 12 months.
Choose anchors based on competitor normalized pricing and your TAC (target account contribution). If the market leader charges $120k/year for enterprise, your Strategic tier should be positioned relative to that anchor (below for penetration or above for premium differentiation), with clear testimonials or proof points to justify your position.
Step 5 — Align sales motions and enablement
Pricing changes fail when sales reps can't articulate the value differences. I update three assets:
- Battlecard — quick objection handling for each tier (e.g., "We need on-premise" → "Strategic includes hybrid deployment options and SLA X").
- Playbook — for each buyer persona, outline which tier to recommend, the negotiation levers, and redlines to avoid.
- Deal desk rules — clear sweet spots for discounting, when to involve finance, and how to structure multi-year incentives.
Run roleplays focusing on common enterprise objections: procurement wanting lower per-seat pricing, security teams asking for certifications, or tech leads demanding custom integrations. Give reps scripts and an "if/then" negotiation matrix.
Step 6 — Launch experiments and measure hard KPIs
Run pricing experiments as controlled tests. Best practice: A/B test on a segment of inbound leads, not the entire funnel. Key KPIs I track:
- ACV and median deal size
- Close rate by tier and channel
- Sales cycle length
- Discount depth and frequency
- Net Revenue Retention (NRR) for customers acquired on each tier
Use your CRM to tag experiments and add custom fields for tier offered, discount, and reason for purchasing. Run tests for a minimum of one sales cycle (often 3–6 months for enterprise) before drawing conclusions.
Step 7 — Iterate on packaging and commercial terms
After initial tests, focus on high-impact levers:
- SLA and support commitments — these often close enterprise deals faster than feature parity.
- Professional services — packaging a fixed-scope implementation reduces procurement friction and increases ACV.
- Billing and contract flexibility — offering multi-year discounts or committed spend options can convert procurement-controlled deals.
Small changes in terms can have outsized effects. For example, adding a 90-day go-live commitment in the Strategic tier reduced procurement negotiation time by 25% in one case I worked on.
Real example: translating a SaaS competitor
Recently I worked with a B2B SaaS company whose competitor had a "Pro" page with a long feature list and no enterprise signals. We turned that into Growth/Scale/Strategic tiers. Key moves that won enterprise deals:
- Moved "API access" from a gated custom quote to the Scale tier and documented response times — this unlocked mid-market buyers.
- Priced Strategic at a 35% premium but bundled a dedicated CSM and a 4-week implementation sprint — procurement preferred the predictable scope.
- Enabled a one-time onboarding fee option for Growth customers to fast-track them to Scale — increased upsell by 18% in 6 months.
The outcome: a 40% increase in average ACV for deals originating from inbound demos and a 20% shorter procurement cycle for Strategic deals.
Practical checklist to ship this week
- Extract competitor pricing into a normalized sheet (due: 2 days).
- Interview sales and two enterprise customers to validate buying criteria (due: 4 days).
- Define three tiers with mapped features, services, and contract levers (due: 1 week).
- Create two test hypotheses and instrument CRM for tracking (due: 10 days).
- Run a 3-month pilot segment and review KPIs monthly.
Translating competitor pricing pages into three testable tiers isn't a one-off exercise — it's a way to make commercial choices explicit and measurable. If you want, I can help build the extraction spreadsheet or draft the sales playbook for your three tiers based on a competitor of your choice.